the story in the New York Times says. "About 28 percent of those who noticed them said the information had influenced their ordering, and 9 out of 10 of those said they had made healthier choices as a result. "But when the researchers checked receipts afterward, they found that people had, in fact, ordered slightly more calories than the typical customer had before the labeling law went into effect, in July 2008." What we say and what we do are often two different things. If I really wanted loaded potato skins or a baked potato piled high with cheese, butter, bacon and sour cream, then it wouldn't matter what the calorie count would be. I do agree with Melody, however, that the data is incomplete. I don't pay attention to calories. I try to monitor sugar and carbohydrate content. So, I wouldn't be ordering potatoes in the first place. But a nutritional analysis on a menu might tell me if the sauce on a pork dish has been loaded with sugar or remind me of why I should stay far, far away from most restaurants' rice dishes or pasta. For others, it could be fat counts or exposure to gluten or peanuts. I'm not in favor of requiring each and every one of these on a menu, any more than I am for forcing restaurants to list calorie counts. Do you think it would affect your eating habits over the long haul, especially if you knew the nutritional breakdown of, say, puffy tacos or a plate of cheese enchiladas? You may say yes now, but think of all the studies that have been printed before on these foods and not one has changed affected the popularity of these dishes. Cracked thinking McDonald's is one restaurant chain that will give you a card with the nutritional breakdown of its dishes. I just wish it was a little more willing to change its egg-buying practices. The American McDonald's recently voted against a move suggested by the Humane Society of the United States to include at least 5 percent of cage-free eggs in their breakfasts. And that was the end of that. Nobody's forcing the company to buy anything it doesn't want. Yet, at the same time, the European McDonald's is moving to all cage-free eggs by the end of this year. In the latter case, all of the European Community will be required to use cage-free eggs by 2012, so the company is simply staying one or two steps ahead of regulation. (Click here for more.) For the past five or six years, I have purchased only cage-free eggs for home use, not just because of the questions of cruelty involved in conventional egg production. The eggs I buy have yolks with the deep orange-y yellow color of a Veuve Clicquot label. The flavor is richer, and so are the results of baked goods I make. That doesn't mean I've stopped eating eggs. I know that restaurants and taco trucks in the area don't use cage-free eggs, nor should they be forced to by some unnecessary regulation. But I would be more willing to patronize a place that offered cage-free eggs in the same way I prefer to visit places that offer the freshest sustainable produce and meats.